Illustration of international rating curve standards.

Rating Curves Workshop – International Best Practices Explored in New Zealand

Stage-discharge rating curves define a unique relation between water level and discharge, enabling continuous derivation of streamflow from water level record. This is important because water level (which is relatively easy to monitor) is only locally relevant whereas discharge (which is relatively difficult to measure directly) is the integral of all runoff processes upstream of the gauge. The vast majority of all streamflow data that has ever been produced is a derived result of a rating curve.

In other words, almost everything that we know (or rather that we think we know) about hydrology is a result of rating curves.

The problem with this paradigm is that there has never been global consensus on best practices for the development and management of rating curves. Assuming stable control features, steady flow, and an abundance of gaugings evenly distributed over the full range of stage and time, then regional differences in methods for rating curve development might be interesting but would probably not be very impactful. However, it is rarely the case that any rating curve problem is fully constrained to reveal a unique solution regardless of approach.

Given that ratings are managed in the real world – not some idealized world of fully predictable hydraulic conditions – it’s curious that there has, historically, been very little interest in the dependency of trillions of dollars’ worth of water resource decisions on the truthfulness of rating curves.

It’s almost like a Stockholm syndrome phenomenon.

Hydrologists, engineers, water resource managers, along with the many other users of flow data are held hostage by their dependence on rating curves. They are grateful to get any data at all and loathe to reject data when there really isn’t any realistic alternative to the status quo.

It is therefore up to the hydrometric community to step up to the challenge of setting standards and developing best practices to ensure that the results of rating curve derivation are, at the very least, consistently meaningful.

It’s not the case that all derived discharge results need to have equally low uncertainty.

However, it is the case that if confidence in the derived result is low that there should be some way of communicating that, under the circumstances, an explicit determination of discharge is not possible. Even when the quantity of flow is uncertain the data may be extremely useful for determining the timing, routing, and relative magnitude of peak events and should certainly inform where some change in the monitoring plan is required to produce better data in the future.

The New Zealand Hydrological Society is showing leadership in developing a path forward. A ratings workshop in Christchurch on the 11th and 12th of April was motivated, in part, by the publication of the National Environmental Monitoring Standard (NEMS) for the construction of stage-discharge and velocity-index ratings and, in part, by discussions with respect to the International Streamflow Rating Curve Project (ISRCP).

The workshop started with an international perspective of how ratings are managed in the United States, Canada, France, Australia, and New Zealand. The rest of the workshop explored many of the issues that need to be well understood to guide development of a best practice approach. All workshop presentations are available online on the NZHS web site.

This may be the first, but it definitely should not be the last international workshop on ratings.

There is interest in holding a similar workshop in Australia and I will be promoting the idea of North American Stream Hydrographers (NASH) hosting a ratings workshop at the CWRA conference in Lethbridge Alberta in 2017. It would be best if we can also inspire similar workshops in Europe, Asia, South America, and Africa. Please let me know if you would like to be involved with organizing a workshop in your region.


Whitepaper.

Free Whitepaper: 5 Best Practices for Building Better Stage-Discharge Rating Curves

A reliable rating curve is one that is credible, defensible, and minimizes re-work. This paper outlines 5 modern best practices used by highly effective hydrographers. Read whitepaper here.

4 Comments
  • Ferdinand Quiñones
    Reply
    Posted at 6:22 am, April 24, 2016

    The USGS has had standards for the development of rating curves for more than 100 years. It has published several handbooks in its series on “Techniques on Water Resources Investigations” describing the best methods and procedures for most types of field conditions. These reports are readily available in the USGS web page. You are again discovering the wheel…..

  • Jagat K Bhusal
    Reply
    Posted at 4:24 pm, April 25, 2016

    Hi Hamilton
    I appreciate your idea of sharing best practices of Rating Curves thru Workshops. The society of hydrologists and Meteorologists Nepal would like to host similar workshop in Nepal so that hydrologists of SAARC region could be benefited. Plz advise us (bhusaljagat@gmail.com) how to proceed to get grant if available to organize the workshop.

  • Sylvand M Kamugisha
    Reply
    Posted at 5:52 am, May 3, 2016

    Dear Stu Hamilton
    Your contribution as always been supper. Rating curve development or validation is still a challenge in certain part of the globe – including my country Tanzania. It may take time to brake through as the new tools being developed are not easily available due to cost implication; you may get them through donors, but you fail to maintain them – sustainability issue; investment in this area is not “stable as our river station controls” are. While stage data collection may be easy but discharge measurements to cover the entire range has been a challenge. The best practices that will ensure the developer of the rating curve get “good” flow measurements at higher stages may add value in the process and motivate more hydrographers in the practice, the profession is attracting few people. Experience, interest, knowledge of the area and the subject, appropriate tools and proper documentation of the past will contribute heavily in sharing the best practices. If this type of workshop happen to be held in East Africa it would be great as all development designs related to water depend on the rating curves we are developing in a challenging situation.

Post a Comment

Comment
Name
Email
Website